Changes for page XWiki.org Information Architecture
Last modified by Ecaterina Moraru on 2013/11/13 12:48
From version 4.1
edited by Ecaterina Valica
on 2010/03/19 18:53
on 2010/03/19 18:53
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
-
Attachments (0 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
-
Objects (0 modified, 3 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -XWiki. evalica1 +xwiki:XWiki.Marta - Content
-
... ... @@ -1,5 +1,9 @@ 1 1 {{velocity}}$xwiki.ssx.use("Improvements.XWikiOrgArchitecture"){{/velocity}} 2 2 3 +{{info}} 4 +This is a suggestion for how the information on xwiki.org can be displayed and grouped. I'm not maximally happy about the result, so feel free to give feedback. 5 +{{/info}} 6 + 3 3 {{html}} 4 4 <h2>Menu</h2> 5 5 <div class="header"> ... ... @@ -139,11 +139,13 @@ 139 139 <li><a href="">Profiling</a></li> 140 140 </ul> 141 141 </div> 142 -<div class=" jmegaclear"> </div>146 +<div class="clearfloats"> </div> 143 143 </div></div> 144 144 {{/html}} 145 145 146 -http://www.mindmeister.com/maps/public_map_shell/8557858/xt4 150 + 151 +The Mindmap is public and can be edited (password protected) 152 +Url: http://www.mindmeister.com/maps/public_map_shell/8557858/xt4 147 147 Password: xwikiIA 148 148 149 149 {{html}}
- xwikiOrg.pdf
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +XWiki.evalica - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +93.5 KB - Content
- XWiki.XWikiComments[0]
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +xwiki:XWiki.Marta - Comment
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,8 @@ 1 +I like the fat footer. 2 + 3 +Some random questions and suggestions: 4 +* Demo sounds a bit "business-y"... Couldn't it be named "Playground" (since I suppose it is the link to playground.xwiki.org anyway)? 5 +* The first group of links in the Documentation column is the only one without a title, and for this reason it looks a bit misplaced. As a quick fix, I'd move them to the bottom of the column, under the title "Miscellaneous" (or something like that). 6 +* Also in the Documentation column: in my opinion, the natural order (wrt the amount of knowledge) is: User's Guide, Admin's Guide, Dev's Guide. 7 +* In the Development column: I'm not sure "Playing with XWiki" is the right title for the second group, I'd go for something more serious here. 8 +* General: I think the order of the topics should be consistent as much as possible in the menu and footer. - Date
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2010-03-23 20:01:44.0
- XWiki.XWikiComments[1]
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +xwiki:XWiki.VincentMassol - Comment
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,5 @@ 1 +Stupid question: Why do we need such a footer if all these entries are available from the menus at the top? 2 + 3 +I feel it may make the page more heavy than it could be, especially on pages that have little content and where you see both the header and footer. 4 + 5 +I don't have a strong opinion right now but I'm just curious about the rationale for the fat footer. - Date
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2010-03-24 07:28:01.545
- XWiki.XWikiComments[2]
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +xwiki:XWiki.Marta - Comment
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +It's like a constantly available site map. It helps the user discover the site, because it gives a good overview of the available information (here, you can see it all at once, while the upper menu can be explored one entry at a time). Also, normally it's not very intrusive, because such footers are supposed to appear in smaller print and lower contrast. - Date
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2010-03-24 14:26:31.372 - Reply To
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1