Last modified by Ecaterina Moraru on 2013/11/13 12:48
From version 17.4
edited by Ecaterina Valica
on 2011/09/13 19:17
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 12.1
edited by Ecaterina Valica
on 2010/03/19 19:06
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Parent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Improvements.XWikiOrgProposal2
Content
... ... @@ -147,6 +147,7 @@
147 147  </div></div>
148 148  {{/html}}
149 149  
150 +<h2> MindMap </h2>
150 150  
151 151  The Mindmap is public and can be edited (password protected)
152 152  Url: http://www.mindmeister.com/maps/public_map_shell/8557858/xt4
XWiki.XWikiComments[0]
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -xwiki:XWiki.Marta
Comment
... ... @@ -1,8 +1,0 @@
1 -I like the fat footer.
2 -
3 -Some random questions and suggestions:
4 -* Demo sounds a bit "business-y"... Couldn't it be named "Playground" (since I suppose it is the link to playground.xwiki.org anyway)?
5 -* The first group of links in the Documentation column is the only one without a title, and for this reason it looks a bit misplaced. As a quick fix, I'd move them to the bottom of the column, under the title "Miscellaneous" (or something like that).
6 -* Also in the Documentation column: in my opinion, the natural order (wrt the amount of knowledge) is: User's Guide, Admin's Guide, Dev's Guide.
7 -* In the Development column: I'm not sure "Playing with XWiki" is the right title for the second group, I'd go for something more serious here.
8 -* General: I think the order of the topics should be consistent as much as possible in the menu and footer.
Date
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2010-03-23 20:01:44.0
XWiki.XWikiComments[1]
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -xwiki:XWiki.VincentMassol
Comment
... ... @@ -1,5 +1,0 @@
1 -Stupid question: Why do we need such a footer if all these entries are available from the menus at the top?
2 -
3 -I feel it may make the page more heavy than it could be, especially on pages that have little content and where you see both the header and footer.
4 -
5 -I don't have a strong opinion right now but I'm just curious about the rationale for the fat footer.
Date
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2010-03-24 07:28:01.0
XWiki.XWikiComments[2]
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -xwiki:XWiki.Marta
Comment
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -It's like a constantly available site map. It helps the user discover the site, because it gives a good overview of the available information (here, you can see it all at once, while the upper menu can be explored one entry at a time). Also, normally it's not very intrusive, because such footers are supposed to appear in smaller print and lower contrast.
Date
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2010-03-24 14:26:31.0
Reply To
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -1
XWiki.XWikiComments[3]
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.evalica
Comment
... ... @@ -1,2 +1,0 @@
1 -This footer is supposed to be only on the Main page. This way the user has a quick overview on the topics the website is covering. Please see
2 -http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/XWikiOrgProposal2Main
Date
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2010-03-25 11:42:49.0
Reply To
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -1
XWiki.XWikiComments[4]
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -xwiki:XWiki.CiprianAmaritei
Comment
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -'Get involved' is the only menu item that ask the user to do something being the only verb (mm except download). It will be a nice idea to differentiate it somehow, or to find another place for it. Maybe a different color or bgcolor or as a subtle button and not a menu item.
Date
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2010-04-15 22:43:08.0