Changes for page XWiki.org Information Architecture
Last modified by Ecaterina Moraru on 2013/11/13 12:48
From version 17.1
edited by Ecaterina Valica
on 2010/03/25 11:41
on 2010/03/25 11:41
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
-
Objects (1 modified, 0 added, 2 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Parent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Improvements.XWikiOrgv2 - Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -XWiki. evalica1 +xwiki:XWiki.Marta
- XWiki.XWikiComments[0]
-
- Date
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2010-03-23 20:01:44. 01 +2010-03-23 20:01:44.552
- XWiki.XWikiComments[1]
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -xwiki:XWiki.VincentMassol - Comment
-
... ... @@ -1,5 +1,0 @@ 1 -Stupid question: Why do we need such a footer if all these entries are available from the menus at the top? 2 - 3 -I feel it may make the page more heavy than it could be, especially on pages that have little content and where you see both the header and footer. 4 - 5 -I don't have a strong opinion right now but I'm just curious about the rationale for the fat footer. - Date
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2010-03-24 07:28:01.0
- XWiki.XWikiComments[2]
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -xwiki:XWiki.Marta - Comment
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -It's like a constantly available site map. It helps the user discover the site, because it gives a good overview of the available information (here, you can see it all at once, while the upper menu can be explored one entry at a time). Also, normally it's not very intrusive, because such footers are supposed to appear in smaller print and lower contrast. - Date
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2010-03-24 14:26:31.0 - Reply To
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1