Changes for page XWiki.org Information Architecture
Last modified by Ecaterina Moraru on 2013/11/13 12:48
To version 5.1
edited by Ecaterina Valica
on 2010/03/19 18:58
on 2010/03/19 18:58
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
-
Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 3 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - xwiki:XWiki.Marta1 +XWiki.evalica - Content
-
... ... @@ -1,9 +1,5 @@ 1 1 {{velocity}}$xwiki.ssx.use("Improvements.XWikiOrgArchitecture"){{/velocity}} 2 2 3 -{{info}} 4 -This is a suggestion for how the information on xwiki.org can be displayed and grouped. I'm not maximally happy about the result, so feel free to give feedback. 5 -{{/info}} 6 - 7 7 {{html}} 8 8 <h2>Menu</h2> 9 9 <div class="header"> ... ... @@ -143,13 +143,11 @@ 143 143 <li><a href="">Profiling</a></li> 144 144 </ul> 145 145 </div> 146 -<div class="clear floats"> </div>142 +<div class="jmegaclear"> </div> 147 147 </div></div> 148 148 {{/html}} 149 149 150 - 151 -The Mindmap is public and can be edited (password protected) 152 -Url: http://www.mindmeister.com/maps/public_map_shell/8557858/xt4 146 +http://www.mindmeister.com/maps/public_map_shell/8557858/xt4 153 153 Password: xwikiIA 154 154 155 155 {{html}}
- XWiki.XWikiComments[0]
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -xwiki:XWiki.Marta - Comment
-
... ... @@ -1,8 +1,0 @@ 1 -I like the fat footer. 2 - 3 -Some random questions and suggestions: 4 -* Demo sounds a bit "business-y"... Couldn't it be named "Playground" (since I suppose it is the link to playground.xwiki.org anyway)? 5 -* The first group of links in the Documentation column is the only one without a title, and for this reason it looks a bit misplaced. As a quick fix, I'd move them to the bottom of the column, under the title "Miscellaneous" (or something like that). 6 -* Also in the Documentation column: in my opinion, the natural order (wrt the amount of knowledge) is: User's Guide, Admin's Guide, Dev's Guide. 7 -* In the Development column: I'm not sure "Playing with XWiki" is the right title for the second group, I'd go for something more serious here. 8 -* General: I think the order of the topics should be consistent as much as possible in the menu and footer. - Date
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2010-03-23 20:01:44.0
- XWiki.XWikiComments[1]
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -xwiki:XWiki.VincentMassol - Comment
-
... ... @@ -1,5 +1,0 @@ 1 -Stupid question: Why do we need such a footer if all these entries are available from the menus at the top? 2 - 3 -I feel it may make the page more heavy than it could be, especially on pages that have little content and where you see both the header and footer. 4 - 5 -I don't have a strong opinion right now but I'm just curious about the rationale for the fat footer. - Date
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2010-03-24 07:28:01.545
- XWiki.XWikiComments[2]
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -xwiki:XWiki.Marta - Comment
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -It's like a constantly available site map. It helps the user discover the site, because it gives a good overview of the available information (here, you can see it all at once, while the upper menu can be explored one entry at a time). Also, normally it's not very intrusive, because such footers are supposed to appear in smaller print and lower contrast. - Date
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2010-03-24 14:26:31.372 - Reply To
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1