Changes for page XWiki.org Information Architecture
Last modified by Ecaterina Moraru on 2013/11/13 12:48
To version 11.1
edited by Ecaterina Valica
on 2010/03/19 19:03
on 2010/03/19 19:03
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
-
Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 3 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - xwiki:XWiki.Marta1 +XWiki.evalica - Content
-
... ... @@ -145,9 +145,11 @@ 145 145 </div> 146 146 <div class="clearfloats"> </div> 147 147 </div></div> 148 -{{/html}} 149 149 149 +<h2> MindMap </h2> 150 150 151 +{{/html}} 152 + 151 151 The Mindmap is public and can be edited (password protected) 152 152 Url: http://www.mindmeister.com/maps/public_map_shell/8557858/xt4 153 153 Password: xwikiIA
- XWiki.XWikiComments[0]
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -xwiki:XWiki.Marta - Comment
-
... ... @@ -1,8 +1,0 @@ 1 -I like the fat footer. 2 - 3 -Some random questions and suggestions: 4 -* Demo sounds a bit "business-y"... Couldn't it be named "Playground" (since I suppose it is the link to playground.xwiki.org anyway)? 5 -* The first group of links in the Documentation column is the only one without a title, and for this reason it looks a bit misplaced. As a quick fix, I'd move them to the bottom of the column, under the title "Miscellaneous" (or something like that). 6 -* Also in the Documentation column: in my opinion, the natural order (wrt the amount of knowledge) is: User's Guide, Admin's Guide, Dev's Guide. 7 -* In the Development column: I'm not sure "Playing with XWiki" is the right title for the second group, I'd go for something more serious here. 8 -* General: I think the order of the topics should be consistent as much as possible in the menu and footer. - Date
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2010-03-23 20:01:44.0
- XWiki.XWikiComments[1]
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -xwiki:XWiki.VincentMassol - Comment
-
... ... @@ -1,5 +1,0 @@ 1 -Stupid question: Why do we need such a footer if all these entries are available from the menus at the top? 2 - 3 -I feel it may make the page more heavy than it could be, especially on pages that have little content and where you see both the header and footer. 4 - 5 -I don't have a strong opinion right now but I'm just curious about the rationale for the fat footer. - Date
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2010-03-24 07:28:01.545
- XWiki.XWikiComments[2]
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -xwiki:XWiki.Marta - Comment
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -It's like a constantly available site map. It helps the user discover the site, because it gives a good overview of the available information (here, you can see it all at once, while the upper menu can be explored one entry at a time). Also, normally it's not very intrusive, because such footers are supposed to appear in smaller print and lower contrast. - Date
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2010-03-24 14:26:31.372 - Reply To
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1