Last modified by Ecaterina Moraru on 2013/11/13 12:48
From version 16.2
edited by Marta Girdea
on 2010/03/23 21:01
Change comment: Added comment
To version 16.4
edited by Marta Girdea
on 2010/03/24 15:26
Change comment: Added comment

Summary

Details

XWiki.XWikiComments[0]
Date
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -2010-03-23 20:01:44.552
1 +2010-03-23 20:01:44.0
XWiki.XWikiComments[1]
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +xwiki:XWiki.VincentMassol
Comment
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,5 @@
1 +Stupid question: Why do we need such a footer if all these entries are available from the menus at the top?
2 +
3 +I feel it may make the page more heavy than it could be, especially on pages that have little content and where you see both the header and footer.
4 +
5 +I don't have a strong opinion right now but I'm just curious about the rationale for the fat footer.
Date
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2010-03-24 07:28:01.545
XWiki.XWikiComments[2]
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +xwiki:XWiki.Marta
Comment
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +It's like a constantly available site map. It helps the user discover the site, because it gives a good overview of the available information (here, you can see it all at once, while the upper menu can be explored one entry at a time). Also, normally it's not very intrusive, because such footers are supposed to appear in smaller print and lower contrast.
Date
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2010-03-24 14:26:31.372
Reply To
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +1