Last modified by Ecaterina Moraru on 2013/11/13 12:49
From version 2.1
edited by Ecaterina Valica
on 2011/02/22 15:18
Change comment: Upload new image SyntaxParagraph.png
To version 3.1
edited by Ecaterina Valica
on 2011/02/23 09:53
Change comment: Upload new image title.png

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,11 @@
1 +== Observations ==
2 +
3 +* Syntax selector is global
4 +[[[[image:SyntaxSelector.png]]>>attach:SyntaxSelector.png]]
5 +* Categories act like "ALL" for their sections (append section and displays them in one place), also when entering the page all the content is displayed. This way there is a way to scan the whole content, but also filter it by using the vertical menu. Also having the content compact helps if the user wants to print the information.
6 +
7 +== Mockups ==
8 +
9 +[[[[image:SyntaxGeneral.png||width="700px"]]>>attach:SyntaxGeneral.png]]
10 +[[[[image:SyntaxParagraph.png||width="700px"]]>>attach:SyntaxParagraph.png]]
11 +[[[[image:SyntaxLinks.png||width="700px"]]>>attach:SyntaxLinks.png]]
SyntaxGeneral.png
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.evalica
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +111.2 KB
Content
SyntaxLinks.png
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.evalica
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +169.7 KB
Content
SyntaxSelector.png
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.evalica
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +3.0 KB
Content
title.png
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.evalica
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +55.7 KB
Content
XWiki.XWikiComments[0]
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +xwiki:XWiki.Marta
Comment
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +I see a little problem here (it's the same problem with the administration UI, but there it was a bit less visible): the vertical navigation is //inside// the content zone, //after// the title, but it is not actually related to the content; it should be represented somewhat differently to show that it is an //external// navigation. Basically, when the navigation bar appears after the title, one expects it to provide access to different //sub-items// of the one given in the title, which is not the case here. I'm not sure if i expressed my self clearly enough and if anybody else sees this as an issue...
Date
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2011-02-22 16:15:59.0