Changes for page Improved edit mode
Last modified by Ecaterina Moraru on 2018/09/26 16:02
From version 11.1
edited by Sergiu Dumitriu
on 2010/01/23 11:24
on 2010/01/23 11:24
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
-
Attachments (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
-
Objects (3 modified, 0 added, 7 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - xwiki:XWiki.Sergiu1 +XWiki.evalica - Content
-
... ... @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ 1 1 = Improved edit mode = 2 2 3 -[[image: propE1.png]]3 +[[image:EditingWikiforDummy.png]] 4 4 5 5 6 6 [[image:objed.png]]
- propE1.png
-
- Size
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -735 491 +73565 - Content
- XWiki.XWikiComments[6]
-
- Comment
-
... ... @@ -3,5 +3,5 @@ 3 3 Three minor comments: 4 4 5 5 * I'd make the title field larger than the parent field, because you usually need to write more in the title field. Of course, then they might look a bit unbalanced, so if this turns out to be an issue they can be left with equal sizes. 6 -* Re "All languages will be in the menu, but will be shown active just the versions that exists for this page" - indeed there must be a difference between the appearance of entries for existing translations and non-existing translation, but I wouldn't say non-existing translation should look/be inactive, because the user should be able to create a new translation, and be aware of this possibility. 6 +* Re "All languages will be in the menu, but will be shown active just the versions that exists for this page" -- indeed there must be a difference between the appearance of entries for existing translations and non-existing translation, but I wouldn't say non-existing translation should look/be inactive, because the user should be able to create a new translation, and be aware of this possibility. 7 7 * I'm not sure about listing the included documents before the text area, but I can't come up with a much better place either. One option is to list them under the text area, because they are not that important. However, this position would really decrease their visibility.
- XWiki.XWikiComments[11]
-
- Date
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2010-01-22 16:43:16.0 1 +2010-01-22 16:43:16.980
- XWiki.XWikiComments[12]
-
- Date
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2010-01-22 16:45:54. 01 +2010-01-22 16:45:54.421
- XWiki.XWikiComments[13]
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -xwiki:XWiki.Marta - Comment
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -For included documents: the brackets should either be around "Includes" as well, or should disappear completely. Otherwise, this looks great. - Date
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2010-01-22 16:50:07.0 - Reply To
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -11
- XWiki.XWikiComments[14]
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XWiki.evalica - Comment
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -done - thanks for all the feedback - Date
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2010-01-22 16:52:40.0 - Reply To
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -13
- XWiki.XWikiComments[15]
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -xwiki:XWiki.Marta - Comment
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Just a thought: would the "autosave" part go better on the same line with the form buttons? IMO, semantically, it is more related to the buttons than to the change comment. - Date
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2010-01-22 16:54:51.0 - Reply To
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -11
- XWiki.XWikiComments[16]
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XWiki.evalica - Comment
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -I didn't test autosave, but every 5 minutes the page saves with the comment described and as minor change if selected? - Date
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2010-01-22 17:11:56.0 - Reply To
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -15
- XWiki.XWikiComments[17]
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XWiki.evalica - Comment
-
... ... @@ -1,3 +1,0 @@ 1 -so autosave acts like a minor change with the current comment - the position is ok if we thing autosave apply those fields. 2 - 3 -Being on the line with buttons would describe the save action better. Would fit so well though. - Date
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2010-01-22 17:24:25.0 - Reply To
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -16
- XWiki.XWikiComments[18]
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -xwiki:XWiki.Marta - Comment
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -I just realized the tags are missing from all the proposals. Was that on purpose? If not, would it be OK to put them under the content? - Date
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2010-01-22 21:03:11.0
- XWiki.XWikiComments[19]
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XWiki.evalica - Comment
-
... ... @@ -1,3 +1,0 @@ 1 -If we put them under the content we really need the separator helping text "Comma separated tags" and this separator shouldn't change to "|" when editing back the page. 2 - 3 -Are we sure we want tags in the edit mode? We already have a interface for them in the view. - Date
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2010-01-23 01:02:16.0 - Reply To
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -18